

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Radio Personalities– Who Needs &#8216;Em?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nealadv.com/advertising/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/</link>
	<description>A full Service Advertising, Marketing and Web Design &#38; Development Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Bocian</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Bocian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your kind words!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your kind words!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forex Beginner Tips</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Forex Beginner Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 05:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-118</guid>
		<description>This is a great blog. Thanks for all your hard work and the info you give.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great blog. Thanks for all your hard work and the info you give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Eggdawg</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Eggdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Personalities + Awareness of Community = Topical delights. A winning formula. I grew up on WGN and Wally Phillips. Amazing amounts of good were performed daily, neighborly good. Callers would ask for help for a good guy with skills who was just laid off. Listeners and companies would respond. At CBS in the 80s I saw research that showed the power of media to do powerful good translated into higher ratings. Looking at PBS research I saw the same. Working for one of the guys who &quot;invented&quot; and launched MTV, I learned that focus groups hated the VJs until you cut them out of the video tape. Then they were missed. The human factor is vital. Sometimes, who knows why.

In the 80&#039;s I watched consultants and the effect they had on killing vibrant local radio. A friend who worked at WUMB said every year consultants would come in and say &quot;This folk format is the only one in America. It can&#039;t possibly be working. Change formats ASAP.&quot; Thank god management didn&#039;t listen. A rose in concrete is still a rose. Maybe a true American beauty that should be spread, Johnny Appleseed style, and nurtured. And when satellite radio started, why didn&#039;t they commission studio Bs all across America to produce programming for them? Instead they built gaudy temples and burned through precious resources. And they failed to support a vibrant ecology of radio. They were old-school selfish and it led to the demise of one of them.

Audio is powerful. I listened recently to the Ed Murrow series on the 1960&#039;s. Powerful punchy writing. Great use of sound. Great use of thought and juxtaposition. The impact makes modern news media product seem very formulaic and lame.

I think we can revive local radio and use of local audio (including via cell phone) if we stop looking at traditional uses of the medium and the platforms and start looking for new ways to use audio to build community and get big things done that don&#039;t start with money but could end up generating money. Gobs and gobs. Because when you start with the heart, the wallet opens wide when the outcome is powerful. Audio moves people wonderfully. Next time your kid challenges you, tell him to watch any movie with the audio off -- then with his eyes closed and the audio ON. One is far more satisfying and intact. The other is highly sensory but virtually meaningless.

I&#039;m launching a Boston-based network of good people. We&#039;re going to make it easy for good people and good organizations to be aware of each other and to help each other in a variety of fast and easy and high impact ways when they&#039;re so moved. I founded and ran Smash Advertising on Newbury Street for 22 years. Top media clients. Launched the Compact Disc with PolyGram. Launched Digital Cable with Comcast Corporate HQ Marketing. Relaunched TV stations during the affiliation switch craze and turned Detroit 62 into a big winner for awhile. Launched NBC Asia in 12 weeks with a positioning that, unknown to us at the time, would foreshadow the Singapore campaign that was being developed in secret called &quot;New Asia&quot;.

Now, in a time with no money, it&#039;s time to launch ways to make it fast and easy for people and organizations to do powerful good. Just like after 9-11. But every day. I completed a site survey for Bloomberg Television on a Friday. We were planning a station domination campaign where you buy every ad space in a commuter rail hub and get hyper-creative with a medley of messages. My wife and I had lived in NYC but I&#039;d never been in the WTC before. So after shooting mundane reference video of the commuter platforms and the escalator message boards and people shopping throughout the underground WTC concourse, my wife and I went to the top to take in the view and pizza and beer. That was Friday. 9-11 was the following Tuesday. I returned to NYC a couple of weeks later. Took the subway to Brooklyn and walked over the most beautiful bridge back to Manhattan and the huge scar. Halfway across the wall of smell hit me. It was burned everything. On the island, the mood was unreal. Friendly. Small town nice. Midwestern helpful. Genuine caring. Status evaporated. People pitched in heart and soul to help folks they&#039;d never met and would never meet again. My buddy was the first government guy to arrive and pull response together. He said it was surreal. He and I are political opposites and golf buddies. He, like me, was a kid from the streets who fell in love with college radio and music and all the possibilities the songs of the sixties and seventies championed.

Maybe we can get back to little experiments, audio experiments, where people act neighborly without seeing each other. If you have an idea, count me in. Audio moves people like nothing else. Could be the big stimulus the nation needs.

Mark
www.linkedin.com/in/onegoodegg

A new website is being built. It&#039;s dedicated people and organizations (all sectors) that want to network but cannot meet. It&#039;s going to make it fast and easy for people acting like real champs and working like an olympic team to pull together and work as one. One nation. For awhile, until America has its mojo back. If you&#039;d like to join, please do! You&#039;ll be pleasantly surprised by who you find there already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalities + Awareness of Community = Topical delights. A winning formula. I grew up on WGN and Wally Phillips. Amazing amounts of good were performed daily, neighborly good. Callers would ask for help for a good guy with skills who was just laid off. Listeners and companies would respond. At CBS in the 80s I saw research that showed the power of media to do powerful good translated into higher ratings. Looking at PBS research I saw the same. Working for one of the guys who &#8220;invented&#8221; and launched MTV, I learned that focus groups hated the VJs until you cut them out of the video tape. Then they were missed. The human factor is vital. Sometimes, who knows why.</p>
<p>In the 80&#8242;s I watched consultants and the effect they had on killing vibrant local radio. A friend who worked at WUMB said every year consultants would come in and say &#8220;This folk format is the only one in America. It can&#8217;t possibly be working. Change formats ASAP.&#8221; Thank god management didn&#8217;t listen. A rose in concrete is still a rose. Maybe a true American beauty that should be spread, Johnny Appleseed style, and nurtured. And when satellite radio started, why didn&#8217;t they commission studio Bs all across America to produce programming for them? Instead they built gaudy temples and burned through precious resources. And they failed to support a vibrant ecology of radio. They were old-school selfish and it led to the demise of one of them.</p>
<p>Audio is powerful. I listened recently to the Ed Murrow series on the 1960&#8242;s. Powerful punchy writing. Great use of sound. Great use of thought and juxtaposition. The impact makes modern news media product seem very formulaic and lame.</p>
<p>I think we can revive local radio and use of local audio (including via cell phone) if we stop looking at traditional uses of the medium and the platforms and start looking for new ways to use audio to build community and get big things done that don&#8217;t start with money but could end up generating money. Gobs and gobs. Because when you start with the heart, the wallet opens wide when the outcome is powerful. Audio moves people wonderfully. Next time your kid challenges you, tell him to watch any movie with the audio off &#8212; then with his eyes closed and the audio ON. One is far more satisfying and intact. The other is highly sensory but virtually meaningless.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m launching a Boston-based network of good people. We&#8217;re going to make it easy for good people and good organizations to be aware of each other and to help each other in a variety of fast and easy and high impact ways when they&#8217;re so moved. I founded and ran Smash Advertising on Newbury Street for 22 years. Top media clients. Launched the Compact Disc with PolyGram. Launched Digital Cable with Comcast Corporate HQ Marketing. Relaunched TV stations during the affiliation switch craze and turned Detroit 62 into a big winner for awhile. Launched NBC Asia in 12 weeks with a positioning that, unknown to us at the time, would foreshadow the Singapore campaign that was being developed in secret called &#8220;New Asia&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, in a time with no money, it&#8217;s time to launch ways to make it fast and easy for people and organizations to do powerful good. Just like after 9-11. But every day. I completed a site survey for Bloomberg Television on a Friday. We were planning a station domination campaign where you buy every ad space in a commuter rail hub and get hyper-creative with a medley of messages. My wife and I had lived in NYC but I&#8217;d never been in the WTC before. So after shooting mundane reference video of the commuter platforms and the escalator message boards and people shopping throughout the underground WTC concourse, my wife and I went to the top to take in the view and pizza and beer. That was Friday. 9-11 was the following Tuesday. I returned to NYC a couple of weeks later. Took the subway to Brooklyn and walked over the most beautiful bridge back to Manhattan and the huge scar. Halfway across the wall of smell hit me. It was burned everything. On the island, the mood was unreal. Friendly. Small town nice. Midwestern helpful. Genuine caring. Status evaporated. People pitched in heart and soul to help folks they&#8217;d never met and would never meet again. My buddy was the first government guy to arrive and pull response together. He said it was surreal. He and I are political opposites and golf buddies. He, like me, was a kid from the streets who fell in love with college radio and music and all the possibilities the songs of the sixties and seventies championed.</p>
<p>Maybe we can get back to little experiments, audio experiments, where people act neighborly without seeing each other. If you have an idea, count me in. Audio moves people like nothing else. Could be the big stimulus the nation needs.</p>
<p>Mark<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/onegoodegg" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/in/onegoodegg</a></p>
<p>A new website is being built. It&#8217;s dedicated people and organizations (all sectors) that want to network but cannot meet. It&#8217;s going to make it fast and easy for people acting like real champs and working like an olympic team to pull together and work as one. One nation. For awhile, until America has its mojo back. If you&#8217;d like to join, please do! You&#8217;ll be pleasantly surprised by who you find there already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Bocian</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Bocian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Ralph, thanks for your comments. I am not sure GOOGLE AUDIO would have been in the best interests for radio or its advertisiers. This alternative buying channel had alot of holes in it.  There were only 700 radio stations onboard across the country. You couldn&#039;t possibly spend effective dollars in the marketplace with such few stations especially when you couple it with GOOGLE buying up Remnant Inventory the day before from radio stations. The following link is an excellent story on Googles departure from radio- its  http://tinyurl.com/brohfm  I am in total agreement with their assessment of the Google withdrawal from Radio. In my opinion, you get what you pay for, and remnant inventory is exactly that.
You can enhance the frequency of an exisiting buy, but NOT make it the BUY!!-N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph, thanks for your comments. I am not sure GOOGLE AUDIO would have been in the best interests for radio or its advertisiers. This alternative buying channel had alot of holes in it.  There were only 700 radio stations onboard across the country. You couldn&#8217;t possibly spend effective dollars in the marketplace with such few stations especially when you couple it with GOOGLE buying up Remnant Inventory the day before from radio stations. The following link is an excellent story on Googles departure from radio- its  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/brohfm" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/brohfm</a>  I am in total agreement with their assessment of the Google withdrawal from Radio. In my opinion, you get what you pay for, and remnant inventory is exactly that.<br />
You can enhance the frequency of an exisiting buy, but NOT make it the BUY!!-N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Paglia</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Paglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Great article, Neal... But I cannot help but wonder, what is the reality of the future of Radio?  Also, I would love to get your take on Google pulling the plug on Google Audio... It seems that it could not have come at a worst time... For the first time in many years, an alternative buying channel for people who want to advertise on Radio would have seemed to be highly desirable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Neal&#8230; But I cannot help but wonder, what is the reality of the future of Radio?  Also, I would love to get your take on Google pulling the plug on Google Audio&#8230; It seems that it could not have come at a worst time&#8230; For the first time in many years, an alternative buying channel for people who want to advertise on Radio would have seemed to be highly desirable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim News</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s time for radio, agencies and all related, to rethink how we measure success, meaning Arbitron. Over the years, small and medium market stations I&#039;ve worked with have contracted seperate ratings research for their specific markets. It&#039;s something I&#039;ve always promoted my entire career as a manager, based on advice from my very first owner, a very savvy radio man who bought his first radio station in 1945. Without fail, that data always conflicted with Arbitron, sometimes to the station&#039;s benefit, sometimes not, but always a better reflection of our position based on staff experiences in the field, by a wide margin. Agencies are coming to know that Arbiton isn&#039;t the Bible and we know there is precedent to say this because we are aware of low Arbitron rated stations scoring sizable agency buys.
PPM is much like college football&#039;s BCS system. A computer program no one, even it&#039;s creators understand fully, yet all know it&#039;s flawed and trusted far too much.
Neal, great article! Thanks so much for the tip about it. Every effort should be made to get it to every level of the business.
CONTENT CONTENT CONTENT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time for radio, agencies and all related, to rethink how we measure success, meaning Arbitron. Over the years, small and medium market stations I&#8217;ve worked with have contracted seperate ratings research for their specific markets. It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve always promoted my entire career as a manager, based on advice from my very first owner, a very savvy radio man who bought his first radio station in 1945. Without fail, that data always conflicted with Arbitron, sometimes to the station&#8217;s benefit, sometimes not, but always a better reflection of our position based on staff experiences in the field, by a wide margin. Agencies are coming to know that Arbiton isn&#8217;t the Bible and we know there is precedent to say this because we are aware of low Arbitron rated stations scoring sizable agency buys.<br />
PPM is much like college football&#8217;s BCS system. A computer program no one, even it&#8217;s creators understand fully, yet all know it&#8217;s flawed and trusted far too much.<br />
Neal, great article! Thanks so much for the tip about it. Every effort should be made to get it to every level of the business.<br />
CONTENT CONTENT CONTENT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Giovanniello</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Giovanniello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Great piece! And I agree totally. My take as a former radio guy is this... Radio has a BIG talent problem. Since the advent of voice tracking and centralized programing the industry has failed to develop new talent. Time was you could find young future stars in the smaller markets holding down multiple positions in their stations and longing for their shot at the show. Sounds like minor league baseball a bit huh? There was always a steady stream of talent in the pipeline and the radio waves crackled with the humor and skills of people who really enjoyed their passion! How many times did you find yourself talking about the antics of Charles, Matty (before disco) or Jess Cain?  What&#039;s going to happen when the big names in Boston or any town retire? Does the industry dare voice track AM drive??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece! And I agree totally. My take as a former radio guy is this&#8230; Radio has a BIG talent problem. Since the advent of voice tracking and centralized programing the industry has failed to develop new talent. Time was you could find young future stars in the smaller markets holding down multiple positions in their stations and longing for their shot at the show. Sounds like minor league baseball a bit huh? There was always a steady stream of talent in the pipeline and the radio waves crackled with the humor and skills of people who really enjoyed their passion! How many times did you find yourself talking about the antics of Charles, Matty (before disco) or Jess Cain?  What&#8217;s going to happen when the big names in Boston or any town retire? Does the industry dare voice track AM drive??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Giovanniello</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Giovanniello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Great piece! And I agree totally. My take as a former radio guy is this... Radio has a BIG talent problem. Since the advent of voice tracking and centralized programing the industry has failed to develop new talent. Time was you could find young future stars in the smaller markets holding down multiple positions in their stations and longing for their shot at the show. Sounds like minor league baseball a bit huh? There was always a steady stream of talent in the pipeline and the radio waves crackled with the humor and skills of people who really enjoyed their passion! How many times did you find yourself talking about the antics of Charles, Matty (before disco) or Jess Cain?  What&#039;s going to happen when the big names in Boston or any town retire? Does the industry dare voice track AM drive??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece! And I agree totally. My take as a former radio guy is this&#8230; Radio has a BIG talent problem. Since the advent of voice tracking and centralized programing the industry has failed to develop new talent. Time was you could find young future stars in the smaller markets holding down multiple positions in their stations and longing for their shot at the show. Sounds like minor league baseball a bit huh? There was always a steady stream of talent in the pipeline and the radio waves crackled with the humor and skills of people who really enjoyed their passion! How many times did you find yourself talking about the antics of Charles, Matty (before disco) or Jess Cain?  What&#8217;s going to happen when the big names in Boston or any town retire? Does the industry dare voice track AM drive??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio&#8217;s Social Community &#171; Radio Evangelist</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio&#8217;s Social Community &#171; Radio Evangelist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] of how local radio personalities make the brand of a radio station. Here&#8217;s a quote from the article: Every personality on a radio station has a job to do, and that job is no easy task. They have to [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of how local radio personalities make the brand of a radio station. Here&#8217;s a quote from the article: Every personality on a radio station has a job to do, and that job is no easy task. They have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://nealadv.com/articles/local-radio-personalities%e2%80%93-who-needs-em/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underthebigtopics.com/?p=351#comment-106</guid>
		<description>This is totally on point and I agree with everything you said.  Unfortunately, Arbitron and its new PPM do not.  In market after market, the PPM is demonstrating that music stations are doing better than stations driven by big personalities.

This seems counter-intuitive.  Music is parity.  Listeners can hear Green Day or U2 (among countless others) on almost every station in the market.  It is the personalities and contests and promotions that make these stations unique.

With all of the different ways to consume media, common sense has me convinced that people aren&#039;t necessarily coming to radio for the music.  For the life of me I can&#039;t figure out why the PPM disagrees.

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally on point and I agree with everything you said.  Unfortunately, Arbitron and its new PPM do not.  In market after market, the PPM is demonstrating that music stations are doing better than stations driven by big personalities.</p>
<p>This seems counter-intuitive.  Music is parity.  Listeners can hear Green Day or U2 (among countless others) on almost every station in the market.  It is the personalities and contests and promotions that make these stations unique.</p>
<p>With all of the different ways to consume media, common sense has me convinced that people aren&#8217;t necessarily coming to radio for the music.  For the life of me I can&#8217;t figure out why the PPM disagrees.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

